This was a highway PPP. Long-term. Availability payment model. ​ The contract had a classic performance regime: KPIs tied to lane availability Routine inspections Pavement condition Safety response times … and one that seemed innocent: “Vegetation height shall not exceed 10 cm in the median or shoulders.” ​ Now, that sounds reasonable. ​ The contract even attached photos showing “desired condition.” Everyone nodded in the negotiation room. “Sure, 10 cm max grass. Easy.” ​ Then came Year 3. A wet spring. A week of rain. Mowers couldn’t get in without damaging saturated shoulders. ​ Grass in some areas grew to 12 cm. Yeah… 12. ​ Did traffic stop? No. Did it affect safety? Not at all. But did the Authority’s Monitoring Team trigger a KPI breach and penalty? Oh, yes. ​ “Non-conformance. Vegetation height exceeds threshold. Deduction: $275,000.” Thank you. ​ The Project Co pushed back: “Come on. We’ll cut it this week. No users complained.” ​ Constructive and reasonable agency response: “KPI breached. Contractually defined. Deduction stands.” ​ How typical. ​ They escalated. ​ An engineer (on the Project Co side) wrote a 23-page memo arguing that vegetation had “minimal to no impact on functionality, safety, or user experience” and should be subject to grace periods during abnormal weather. ​ At least, they did not spend $50k in consultants to write that… I have seen some of those! ​ The agency lawyer replied with a one-liner: “Contract does not reference weather exceptions for KPI 3.4.1. Clause stands.” ​ The Project Co had to either: Swallow the deduction (and lower IRR), Trigger a dispute resolution process (costing more in legal fees), or Accept it and renegotiate next year during KPI refinement talks. ​ They took the hit. ​ Here’s where it gets worse: Someone from the maintenance contractor later joked in a meeting: “You know what would’ve been cheaper? Hiring goats.” ​ Lesson? Maintenance KPIs are not about reasonableness. They’re about trigger logic. If it’s binary and the Authority wants to play hardball, you're toast. ​ If you’re ever drafting a PPP contract, build in: Tolerance bands Grace periods during abnormal conditions Dispute buffers before penalties And for god’s sake, make sure someone with dirt under their nails reviews the KPI list, not just lawyers and MBAs. ​ Because the only thing more humiliating than paying $275,000 in deductions… …is explaining to your board that it was for grass. ​ More interesting stories? Here you are! ​ More of this, below. ​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. ​ ​ |
I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
If you don't know Alex Hormozi, you should look for him... he is everywhere. If you want to sell something, you should read his books. If you want to get inspired, you should read how he started from broke to something. Yesterday I saw one of this posts... it was so powerful, that I wanted to share it with you: Instead of trying to get rich. Do this. Try not being poor. This is what poor people do:1. Start many projects, finish none. 2. Think that understanding the basics and doing the basics...
I once had a client that thought they were running a design-build project.Except they weren’t.They were in a PPP. But nobody told them.Or worse… they didn’t want to know. Their consultants kept “refining the design.”Week after week.Change after change.Every corridor got moved.Every façade got re-imagined.Every mechanical room had a “better idea.” They thought this was free.Like playing with Lego. Except…In PPP, every “little tweak” costs millions.Every delay hits financing.Every change...
Visualize this. A major bridge. Somewhere in North America. Very long. Two box girder, i.e., two boxes holding two decks with three lanes each. One requirement. “One footpath to connect the two abutments” Two years after the contract is signed, the designers designed the footpath on one of the laterals of the bridge , the client accepted it. Life was good. But I asked. “What is this footpath for?” A burial in the Artic seemed like a party. Not even the cricks spoke. Nobody knew. Is this for...