Once upon a time, in a European country, which shall remain nameless, but that’s known for great wine, fantastic cheese, too much pasta and good weather even if in Spain all that is better, decided to build a PPP highway connecting two major cities. The project went through the usual process, feasibility studies, tenders, and a long, complex financial close. Everything seemed on track. Tax payer money was spent, as usual, as if was nobody’s. ​ The private consortium, excited about the project, designed a state-of-the-art highway with cutting-edge tolling technology. The best of the best. The more modern. The most expensive… wining points in a weird tender. ​ There was just one small… well, tiny problem. ​ Nobody Thought About the Exits. ​ Yes, the exits in the highway… ​ The highway was built, beautifully paved, fully operational… but it had no proper exits for local towns along the way. Just the two cities. ​ Of course, this couldn’t be Spain. We like to use high speed trains in the metro, putting stops every few hundred metres so that full potential of the trains cannot be reached. ​ Well… this tiny problem, as I was saying, meant that only people traveling between the two big cities could use it, while smaller towns in between had no access unless they drove way out of their way just to get onto the road. ​ Why? Probably no election time. ​ The result? Traffic forecasts were completely wrong. Toll revenue was a disaster. The private operator had to negotiate a bailout because they couldn’t pay back the debt. ​ The Government’s Genius Solution? The government, realizing the mistake, proposed building new exits. ​ Sounds reasonable, right? But since this was a PPP contract, every additional exit was considered a “variation,” meaning the government had to pay millions more to the private consortium to fix what should have been obvious from the start! ​ Lesson Learned? Drink Spanish wine, Spanish Cheese and get a holiday home in Mallorca, and if you ever work on a PPP highway, don’t forget to look at the exits! ​ Would you like another story? There are plenty of PPP blunders below. ​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. ​ ​ |
I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
Yesterday I told you about a KPI regime that seemed a horror story. Today, I bring you another that kills. Kills contract, I mean. I often tell people that vertical PPPs are not my cup of tea. Hospitals… I run away. Too complicated. Too political. Too high stakes. Take the wave of hospital PPPs in the UK during the 2000s. On paper, they looked brilliant: new facilities, modern equipment, long-term maintenance secured. But still… the KPI regime was written by bureaucrats with too much coffee...
Some PPPs die before they start.Others collapse under the weight of construction. And then there are those that rot from within — strangled by their own KPI regime. Take the Peterborough Prison PPP in the UK.On paper, it was innovative: the first privately financed prison with a focus on rehabilitation. The government loved the concept. The innocent believers in human nature wet dreamt about it. The financiers lined up.The operator thought they could make it work… if not, they would still...
Humiliation can come in many ways. But probably, one of the most humiliating failures a government can suffer in a PPP is the silence. This happened in a mid-sized developed country of the Commonwealth just a few years ago. The government wanted a flagship social infrastructure project: a cluster of new courthouses and justice facilities, spread across regional cities. They framed it as transformational. A “once in a generation” opportunity. Ministers on stage, cameras rolling, the usual...