|
Once upon a time, in a European country, which shall remain nameless, but that’s known for great wine, fantastic cheese, too much pasta and good weather even if in Spain all that is better, decided to build a PPP highway connecting two major cities. The project went through the usual process, feasibility studies, tenders, and a long, complex financial close. Everything seemed on track. Tax payer money was spent, as usual, as if was nobody’s. The private consortium, excited about the project, designed a state-of-the-art highway with cutting-edge tolling technology. The best of the best. The more modern. The most expensive… wining points in a weird tender. There was just one small… well, tiny problem. Nobody Thought About the Exits. Yes, the exits in the highway… The highway was built, beautifully paved, fully operational… but it had no proper exits for local towns along the way. Just the two cities. Of course, this couldn’t be Spain. We like to use high speed trains in the metro, putting stops every few hundred metres so that full potential of the trains cannot be reached. Well… this tiny problem, as I was saying, meant that only people traveling between the two big cities could use it, while smaller towns in between had no access unless they drove way out of their way just to get onto the road. Why? Probably no election time. The result? Traffic forecasts were completely wrong. Toll revenue was a disaster. The private operator had to negotiate a bailout because they couldn’t pay back the debt. The Government’s Genius Solution? The government, realizing the mistake, proposed building new exits. Sounds reasonable, right? But since this was a PPP contract, every additional exit was considered a “variation,” meaning the government had to pay millions more to the private consortium to fix what should have been obvious from the start! Lesson Learned? Drink Spanish wine, Spanish Cheese and get a holiday home in Mallorca, and if you ever work on a PPP highway, don’t forget to look at the exits! Would you like another story? There are plenty of PPP blunders below.
​
PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
Look. There are many boring industries. Infrastructure is one of them. PPPs are even worse. Long meetings. Technical reports. Risk registers. Governance papers. Contracts nobody wants to read. Very boring. Good. Boring markets are often gold mines. And you know my opinion on this too. The best PPP or major infrastructure project is usually boring too. No drama. No heroic recovery plan. No ministerial crisis. No contractor threatening to walk away. No board meeting that feels like a hostage...
The person across the table is rarely the real problem. The unresolved issue is. But once negotiations get tense, we forget that. We start blaming motives. Questioning competence. Building a case against the person. And from there, everything gets worse. Because when you turn the other side into the enemy, solving the issue becomes almost impossible. Bye, bye, partnership. The better approach is simple: Separate the person from the problem. Be hard on the issue. Clear on the facts. Direct...
January 2018. London. Whittington Hospital. A fire. It was controlled. Patients evacuated. The hospital continued operating. Crisis over? Not even close. The fire exposed a much bigger problem. There were serious disagreements. Condition of the building. The fire safety defects. Who was contractually responsible for fixing them. Etc. The NHS Trust said the PFI company had failed to remedy the problems. The PFI company disagreed. A “mis huevos” (ego battle) situation… Payments were withheld....