Great advice paid for peanuts


I stopped this idea of paying for an hour.
It’s outdated.
Consultancy as we know it is dead.
But many consultants have not realized of that.

Paying by the hour encourages inefficiency.
It’s easy.
Lazy.
Change a monthly salary for monthly hours at a rate.
Sounds familiar.
But it’s wrong.

Knowledge cannot be measure in hours.
You have it.
And you can present it in seconds… not hours.

Some people understand this concept.
It happened to me a few months ago.
A post in LinkedIn about a particular problem in real estate.
A message: “I want to talk to you. I pay you $1.000.”
“Sure (incredulous), here you are the account”.
10 min later the pop up on the phone: “You have received a transfer”
25 min of conversation and it was over.
I probably saved him 1-2 million dollars on his project.
Not bad for 1.000$ advice.
1.000$ is not bad for 25 min… but it’s too little for the value I gave.

I have this discussion over an over with the public and the private sectors.
But our reptilian brains still ask us to pay “by the hour”.
We see each hour. The effort. The heat on the chair while we staying there.
But, as I said. It’s wrong.

A few pieces of advice on how to tender a PPP project is probably saving hundreds of millions to a transport agency I gave advice to.
An obvious mistake.
If paid by the hour, imagine the party…
Advice for peanuts.

No.

That’s wrong.

In the link below, you have many hours though.
And knowledge.
And added value.

But as I can sell it to many, you can get it for peanuts.

If you are thinking about, don’t.
Price will double October 1.
​

​100 Q&A About PPP that you MUST KNOW​

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

​

​

Vicente Valencia

I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

If you have visited bars once in your life, you’ve had one of these moments… You know. That moment when someone brags at the bar drinking another gyn about a deal they “closed”? They talk and talk. And you just know they didn’t read the contract. Yeah. This is that story—except with trains. Let’s go to Sydney Airport Rail Link, late 1990s. The private consortium thought they had cracked the code: Four stations. Direct airport access. Passengers in the tens of thousands. “We’ll be printing...

On a corner. Waiting to cross the Street. I see one of those big LED billboards full of ads. First ad. Store Brand, package of 1 kg macaroni. Save $0.79. Next ad: A new perfume by DIOR. Then, people wonder why they don’t sell or why some think that marketing is a waste of money. With marketers like the ones deciding to put their ads on those billboards you don’t need competition or the next crisis to justify failure. Come on! And you know what? With PPPs is exactly the same. Yeah. Public...

One of the myths I hear all the time: “Why let the private sector finance if public debt is cheaper?” Sounds smart. But it’s wrong. First—there are PPPs that financed themselves cheaper than governments. Think Canada, Australia, UK deals during times of tight public budgets, when private sponsors locked better terms because of their structure, guarantees, or sheer market confidence. Think of some less developed countries where lenders prefer dealing with private sponsors than unexperienced...