Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
Which of these two options would you choose?
|
Daniel Kahneman, the author of Thinking, Fast and Slow, did an experiment. He gave two options: Would you accept a gamble that offers a 10% chance to win $95 and a 90% chance to lose $5? Or. Would you pay $5 to participate in a lottery that offers a 10% chance to win $100 and a 90% chance to win nothing? Well… if you studied engineering, you have convinced yourself that the two problems are identical. In both, you are either richer by $95 or poorer by $5. But that’s engineering mindset… No question why we take so long to find someone that can endure us. The reality is that the second option attracts more people. A bad outcome is much more acceptable if it is framed as the cost of a lottery ticket that did not win than if it is simply described as losing a gamble. We should not be surprised: losses evoke stronger negative feelings than costs. If you have no idea what I’m talking about, you should take a look to the book below. It will teach you to avoid gambles and call some costs, investments.
PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
Vicente Valencia
Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
I’m going to China in a few days. Suppliers. Factories. Meetings. And plenty of opportunities to discover that what I thought I knew was wrong. Preferably before transferring any money. In big infrastructure projects, that timing matters rather a lot. Take Brisbane’s Clem7 tunnel. In April 2010, its operator announced that 1.24 million vehicle trips had been made through the tunnel during its first three weeks. Almost 59,000 a day. Lovely numbers. But meaningless… If you stopped at that...
Look at this story told to me by Muhammad Danish, a top expert in PPP... Pakistan. A road to be built. A few years ago. Inflation was running wild. Prices were changing so fast that a contractor could buy materials on Monday and regret being born by Thursday… until he discovered he could sell them for a fortune on Sunday. The government’s advisers saw the problem. If the private partner had to carry all the price escalation risk, the bids would be absurdly expensive. Or there would be no bids...
“No fee paid upfront.” “If you can bring equity capital of $45 million, then we can talk about success fees.” Wonderful. You bring the project. I bring the investors. The contacts. The credibility. The hours. And the working capital to finance my own involvement in your adventure. Then, if everything works, we can talk about paying me. Not pay me. Talk about it. Beautiful little detail. Look. I have nothing against success fees. I do work on success. But think about it. Working entirely at...