|
Last week I went to a meeting where a team exposed their plan to build a big stadium. Here, where I live now, in Auckland, New Zealand. No offense, but I love these meetings. Observing. Learning. Laughing sometimes. They presented other successful cases. Beautiful stadiums… Detroit, Los Angeles, Hong Kong… You know, great stadiums, with fantastic real estate developments around. Successful cases. The guys presenting have experience. Years and years… They said that these projects can take 10, 12 or 22 years to be completed. But still… They say that they want it finish by 2029. You count. 2025 2026 2027 2028 and 2029… That’s the fallacy of the best case… well… almost the ideal case. Ignoring experience. Ignoring what dozens of similar asset class projects have shown you. That you should aim for 10-12 years… instead of 5. If you don’t do it, you’ll depart from the wrong premises and assumptions. You’ll buying all the tickets for lottery of disasters, frustrations, failures, and all series of cost overruns. And I see this all the time. Big and small projects. When I talked to my more trusted contractor for one of my projects in Spain, his message is clear: “This apartment, in 2 months, is ready”. Yeah… Two months… Yeah… The reality is that the shortest similar flip took me 4 months and a half… You say this to him and the answer is… “Yeah, but in that case… what happened is that the materials didn’t arrive, and then the electrician went on holidays and then we needed to change the layout of the kitchen, and…” Yeah… Look. There is no project with “something happening”. No project without excuses. The average I get for any similar full renovation like that apartment is 6 months… Of course, it could be done in an ideal world in 2 or 3 months, but data tells me a different story. That ideal worlds are just that… ideal. Another example. One of my projects, for a full building, was going to be finished in 9 months. They started well. Very well… But the invoices arriving to me were only 40 to 45k€ a month… I was expecting at least 100k€. Suddenly, we needed to stop works in a small section of the building for analysis. It took us 3 weeks. Remember, a small section of the building, they were still working in the rest of the building. After we finished, with no additional works required, the contractor told us that he needed 3 extra months… additional time… Of course, they were late before. How did I know? First, cash. Second, data. These projects take a year in average. Materials don’t arrive. A subcontractor goes bankrupt. We need to adjust design for unexpected conditions. A client requests a small change somewhere. The guy of the kitchens gets delayed. Etc. Every project has some funny stories… But, let me more precise. Any project, any, all projects have some of those stories. So, imagining yourself being able to deliver in ideal conditions, with no issues, no room for unexpected things… is a fallacy. And this fallacy can get you into trouble as an investor very, very soon… and those troubles are terrible if you are playing with cash flows and having multiple projects. In publics projects, the answer is like this: “Vicente, but if I had to tell that this project cost $1bn more and 10 years instead of 5, it won’t go forward…”. This interesting answer is for another email. So, don’t think of rainbows in the sky but data in your Excel file. What’s data telling you? I’d love to hear your thoughts about this. Answer back, I love reading you. Stories, learnings and much more like this in my mentorship. ​The Real Estate Investing Incubator - 99$/month​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit theantagonist.co PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. |
Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
In July 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were descending towards the Moon. Then their computer started displaying alarms. 1202 An excellent moment to discover that a number means absolutely nothing to you. Imagine being in Mission Control. Two men approaching the lunar surface. An alarming computer. And someone asking whether they should continue. Perhaps you could open with: “Thank you. That’s a very interesting question.” Fortunately, NASA had Jack Garman supporting guidance officer...
In 1628, Sweden launched a magnificent warship. The Vasa. Built to impress. Which it did. Then it sank. Which was less impressive. Before the maiden voyage, thirty men had been asked to run backwards and forwards across the upper deck to test its stability. XXI sophistication… No joke… Today, we pute trucks full of rocks on new bridges… Well… The ship rolled so badly that the test had to be stopped. You would think this may… have triggered a discussion. At least something like: Let’s not...
The government wanted fewer rats. So it paid people to kill them. People started breeding them. Unattended consequences are called today. Or wrong clauses and incentives, as it should be. Hanoi. 1902. The French colonial authorities had a rat problem. And a solution that looked perfectly sensible. Pay a bounty. Require proof. Count the results. Lovely. But… There was just one small detail. The proof was a tail. Not a dead rat. Apparently, nobody thought that distinction would become...