I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
You've been told a fallacy
|
Last week I went to a meeting where a team exposed their plan to build a big stadium. ​ Here, where I live now, in Auckland, New Zealand. ​ No offense, but I love these meetings. Observing. Learning. Laughing sometimes. ​ They presented other successful cases. Beautiful stadiums… Detroit, Los Angeles, Hong Kong… ​ You know, great stadiums, with fantastic real estate developments around. Successful cases. ​ The guys presenting have experience. Years and years… They said that these projects can take 10, 12 or 22 years to be completed. ​ But still… ​ They say that they want it finish by 2029. ​ You count. 2025 2026 2027 2028 and 2029… ​ That’s the fallacy of the best case… well… almost the ideal case. ​ Ignoring experience. Ignoring what dozens of similar asset class projects have shown you. That you should aim for 10-12 years… instead of 5. ​ If you don’t do it, you’ll depart from the wrong premises and assumptions. You’ll buying all the tickets for lottery of disasters, frustrations, failures, and all series of cost overruns. ​ And I see this all the time. Big and small projects. ​ When I talked to my more trusted contractor for one of my projects in Spain, his message is clear: “This apartment, in 2 months, is ready”. Yeah… Two months… Yeah… ​ The reality is that the shortest similar flip took me 4 months and a half… ​ You say this to him and the answer is… ​ “Yeah, but in that case… what happened is that the materials didn’t arrive, and then the electrician went on holidays and then we needed to change the layout of the kitchen, and…” ​ Yeah… ​ Look. ​ There is no project with “something happening”. No project without excuses. ​ The average I get for any similar full renovation like that apartment is 6 months… Of course, it could be done in an ideal world in 2 or 3 months, but data tells me a different story. That ideal worlds are just that… ideal. ​ Another example. ​ One of my projects, for a full building, was going to be finished in 9 months. They started well. Very well… But the invoices arriving to me were only 40 to 45k€ a month… I was expecting at least 100k€. Suddenly, we needed to stop works in a small section of the building for analysis. It took us 3 weeks. Remember, a small section of the building, they were still working in the rest of the building. After we finished, with no additional works required, the contractor told us that he needed 3 extra months… additional time… ​ Of course, they were late before. ​ How did I know? ​ First, cash. Second, data. ​ These projects take a year in average. ​ Materials don’t arrive. A subcontractor goes bankrupt. We need to adjust design for unexpected conditions. A client requests a small change somewhere. The guy of the kitchens gets delayed. Etc. ​ Every project has some funny stories… ​ But, let me more precise. ​ Any project, any, all projects have some of those stories. ​ So, imagining yourself being able to deliver in ideal conditions, with no issues, no room for unexpected things… is a fallacy. ​ And this fallacy can get you into trouble as an investor very, very soon… and those troubles are terrible if you are playing with cash flows and having multiple projects. ​ In publics projects, the answer is like this: “Vicente, but if I had to tell that this project cost $1bn more and 10 years instead of 5, it won’t go forward…”. This interesting answer is for another email. ​ So, don’t think of rainbows in the sky but data in your Excel file. What’s data telling you? ​ I’d love to hear your thoughts about this. Answer back, I love reading you. ​ Stories, learnings and much more like this in my mentorship. ​The Real Estate Investing Incubator - 99$/month​ ​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit theantagonist.co PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. ​ ​ |
Vicente Valencia
I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
One of the “interesting” things about having sat at all four corners of the table, and having done so in several countries, is that you start comparing. Yes, I know. It’s a Spanish sickness. We like criticising more than we like evading taxes… or voting for politicians who do. I can’t escape my genes, no matter how a Kiwi I've become. You compare. And sooner or later, you reach a painful conclusion. Especially now that I live in the paradise of the South Pacific. Nations led by builders build...
Suggesting beats showing. Always. Just see what happens to women that show too much. They attract the wrong type of men… or probably not. They just attract all men… and then, it’s more complicated to do a good selection. The chances of getting it wrong increase. But if they just suggest, they tend to attract a more sophisticated level of men. Less brutal, savage, and basic. Then, the chances of getting the wrong type of men decrease. And remember, women risked their lives having s€x not long...
You can find horror stories almost everywhere. Not just developed countries. And successful ones too… as it’s not rocket science. Before 2010, the Philippines’ PPP program was infamous for all the wrong reasons: legal uncertainty, endless bid delays, weak feasibility studies, and risk allocations that scared investors away faster than typhoons. So they decided to stop, review, learn and repeat. They started to ask the market about what was wrong with the last projects. They noted. And decided...