You've been told a fallacy


Last week I went to a meeting where a team exposed their plan to build a big stadium.

Here, where I live now, in Auckland, New Zealand.

No offense, but I love these meetings.

Observing.

Learning.

Laughing sometimes.

They presented other successful cases.

Beautiful stadiums…

Detroit, Los Angeles, Hong Kong…

You know, great stadiums, with fantastic real estate developments around.

Successful cases.

The guys presenting have experience.

Years and years…

They said that these projects can take 10, 12 or 22 years to be completed.

But still…

They say that they want it finish by 2029.

You count.

2025

2026

2027

2028 and

2029…

That’s the fallacy of the best case… well… almost the ideal case.

Ignoring experience.

Ignoring what dozens of similar asset class projects have shown you.

That you should aim for 10-12 years… instead of 5.

If you don’t do it, you’ll depart from the wrong premises and assumptions.

You’ll buying all the tickets for lottery of disasters, frustrations, failures, and all series of cost overruns.

And I see this all the time.

Big and small projects.

When I talked to my more trusted contractor for one of my projects in Spain, his message is clear:

“This apartment, in 2 months, is ready”.

Yeah…

Two months…

Yeah…

The reality is that the shortest similar flip took me 4 months and a half…

You say this to him and the answer is…

“Yeah, but in that case… what happened is that the materials didn’t arrive, and then the electrician went on holidays and then we needed to change the layout of the kitchen, and…”

Yeah…

Look.

There is no project with “something happening”.

No project without excuses.

The average I get for any similar full renovation like that apartment is 6 months…

Of course, it could be done in an ideal world in 2 or 3 months, but data tells me a different story.

That ideal worlds are just that… ideal.

Another example.

One of my projects, for a full building, was going to be finished in 9 months.

They started well.

Very well…

But the invoices arriving to me were only 40 to 45k€ a month… I was expecting at least 100k€.

Suddenly, we needed to stop works in a small section of the building for analysis. It took us 3 weeks.

Remember, a small section of the building, they were still working in the rest of the building.

After we finished, with no additional works required, the contractor told us that he needed 3 extra months… additional time…

Of course, they were late before.

How did I know?

First, cash.

Second, data.

These projects take a year in average.

Materials don’t arrive.

A subcontractor goes bankrupt.

We need to adjust design for unexpected conditions.

A client requests a small change somewhere.

The guy of the kitchens gets delayed.

Etc.

Every project has some funny stories…

But, let me more precise.

Any project, any, all projects have some of those stories.

So, imagining yourself being able to deliver in ideal conditions, with no issues, no room for unexpected things… is a fallacy.

And this fallacy can get you into trouble as an investor very, very soon… and those troubles are terrible if you are playing with cash flows and having multiple projects.

In publics projects, the answer is like this: “Vicente, but if I had to tell that this project cost $1bn more and 10 years instead of 5, it won’t go forward…”. This interesting answer is for another email.

So, don’t think of rainbows in the sky but data in your Excel file.

What’s data telling you?

I’d love to hear your thoughts about this. Answer back, I love reading you.

Stories, learnings and much more like this in my mentorship.

​The Real Estate Investing Incubator - 99$/month​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit theantagonist.co

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

Weekly insights on how to perform when it matters | High-stakes decisions. Real situations. No BS. | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

Ah… this consultancy world… it’s so funny. I just lost a mandate. The reason? Apparently, I was “too active.” Literally. Yes… this is why it is “too active” Not too expensive. Not too inexperienced. Not too busy. Too active. Infrastructure is… fascinating. Apparently, some projects need someone who doesn't ask too many questions. Doesn't challenge too many assumptions. Doesn't make too many decisions. And, above all, doesn't make anyone above them look uncomfortable. Ideally, someone who...

1959 Japan started building a high-speed railway between Tokyo and Osaka. 515 kilometres. A completely new railway system. New tracks. New trains. New technology. By October 1964, passengers were travelling at over 200 km/h. Five and a half years. No AI, folks. No digital twins. And of course, no PowerPoint presentations explaining why delivery was becoming increasingly complicated. Just a country with a clear objective. And, of course, people determined to achieve it instead of jumping onto...

Yesterday, I received a bothering message from DHL indicating that my Canadian election package was in its way… So, today… Canada. 1907 Canada was building one of the most ambitious bridges in the world. The Quebec Bridge. A spectacular structure across the St. Lawrence River. Almost 550 metres between its main supports. A masterpiece of engineering. At least… as usual… on paper. The engineer was Theodore Cooper. Experienced. Respected. Confident. Very confident. Maybe too much… At some...