How to turn a $680M project into a public disaster (in under 6 months)


Sydney.
Early 2000s.
The government wanted less traffic in the CBD.
Private investors wanted 30 years of fat toll revenues.
Everyone thought they had a winner.

​

The Cross City Tunnel PPP was signed in 2002.

​
Cost? Around AUD 680 million.
Forecast? 90,000 cars a day.
Reality? Barely 20,000.

And the toll?
$4.50.

​
Drivers said: I'd rather sit in a traffic jam for free, thanks.

​

To make it worse, the government had promised to close surface roads to "push" traffic into the tunnel.

As intelligent as high security officials putting journalists in the WhatsApp groups…

​
Imagine how well that went down with voters.

​

Within months:

  • The private consortium sued the government for breach of contract.
  • The government sued back for misrepresentation.
  • Drivers sued for unfair closures.
  • Shareholders sued the board for terrible forecasting.

​

Everyone suing everyone.

​
A beautiful mess.

By 2007, the tunnel went bankrupt.
Sold off to a pension fund for cents on the dollar.

​

Brutal lessons:

  • Fake traffic forecasts eventually blow up in your face.
  • You can't bully drivers into using your asset.
  • Toll prices aren’t a detail — they are life or death.
  • If the public hates your PPP, it’s already dead.

​

Moral:
If your project needs lawsuits, road closures, and magic math to work,
it doesn’t work.
It never did.

​

I have other interesting and horror stories about my last project in the link below.

​

$99.90

The 15 Top Lessons of a PPP Project Nightmare

Learn about:
The number 1 killer of Projects
Why this was not going to be just "another construction project, mate"... Read more

​

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

​

​

Vicente Valencia

I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | C-Suite Executive | Mentor, Coach, Strategic Consultant | Real Estate Investor | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

Now, the story of a project that went so wrong, they had to spend millions just to undo what they built. The project? The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in Glasgow, Scotland. Cost? £842 million. Procurement model? Traditional public procurement. Outcome? Let’s just say you don’t want to be admitted there. The Plan Build one of the biggest, most advanced hospitals in Europe. A new national symbol of innovation. State-funded. Fast-tracked. Public sector delivery all the way. No PPP....

Same country. Same contractors. Same scale. Same type of road. One was built through a PPP. The other? A good old-fashioned, government-run, multi-package mess. Let’s meet the contenders. Contender 1: The PPP Project: Peninsula Link, Victoria 27 km freeway Design, build, finance, operate $759 million AUD Delivered by Southern Way Consortium (Abigroup + Bilfinger + RBS + John Laing) Opened: 2013 On time. On budget. No drama. Not a single front-page headline. Which, in PPP terms, is a love...

Grab the popcorns. Let me tell you about a project that had everything: Corruption Protests Love Treason. Political revenge And a final bill… with zero water delivered Welcome to Mexicali, Mexico. A case that is on Spielberg’s table… or should be. Once upon a time, the government had an idea: “Let’s build a desalination plant. The private sector will pay. We’ll pay later. Easy.” Enter: A PPP for a $500M desalination plant to supply water to Mexicali, a dry city near the U.S. border. The Plan...