Lawyers paradise - 7 years late, 3x the cost... and a city full of lawsuits


Edinburgh, Scotland.
Mid-2000s.
A shiny new tram network was promised.
Fast, green, world-class transport across the city.

Greta was not born yet… but she could be smiling for ours to a project like this.

The vehicle?
Of course…

A complex PPP scheme led by Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE) with multiple contractors, including Bilfinger Berger and Siemens.

​
Signed in 2006.
Cost? ÂŁ375 million.
Opening date? 2011.

What actually happened?

  • Endless disputes between the public agency and the private contractors.
  • Construction delays so bad that people literally forgot the city was supposed to have trams.
  • Streets ripped up for years, paralyzing local businesses.
  • Costs ballooned to ÂŁ1 billion — almost 3x the original.

Lawyers paradise… Who sued who?

  • Contractors sued the public agency for design changes and late payments.
  • The public agency threatened to sue the contractors for cost overruns and missed deadlines.
  • Residents and businesses started separate lawsuits over lost income and disturbance.

2014 — The first line finally opens.
Seven years late.
One single line instead of the full network.

The political fallout?

  • Heads rolled.
  • Public trust in PPPs collapsed.
  • Edinburgh became a punchline for bad project management across Europe.
  • Great was born… unhappy.

Brutal lessons:

  • If the project scope isn’t 100% locked before signing, you're building a time bomb.
  • Multi-contractor PPPs need wartime-grade governance, not PowerPoint slides.
  • Political wishful thinking kills delivery discipline.
  • Litigation isn't a risk; it’s a certainty when your contract is a mess.

Moral:
If your project needs seven years of excuses, lawsuits, and triple the money,
you didn’t build infrastructure.
You built a monument to failure.

I have other interesting and horror stories about my last project in the link below.

$99.90

The 15 Top Lessons of a PPP Project Nightmare

Learn about:
The number 1 killer of Projects
Why this was not going to be just "another construction project, mate"... Read more

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

Alfred Hitchcock had a peculiar habit. He appeared for a few seconds in almost every one of his films. At first it was a joke. Then it became a problem. Audiences started watching the screen obsessively, trying to spot him. They were no longer following the story. They were hunting Hitchcock. So in films like Psycho, he solved it in a simple way. He appeared right at the beginning. Problem solved. Distraction gone. When I review PPP bids, clients always ask the same question. “Vicente…...

Everyone loves the construction contractor. Big cranes. Huge concrete pours. Drone videos. Beautiful. But in a PPP project… Construction lasts 3 years, maybe 4… except in NZ… around 8 years – don’t ask me why. Operations last 30. And yet, people spend 90% of their time talking about construction. Very clever. And I understand… it’s the place of the big bucks; the ministers’ visit and the Public Relationship paradise. Question 72 of the course below answers a simple question: What is a good...

You hear this word a lot in PPP meetings. Bankable. “This contract must be bankable.” Everyone nods. No one asks the obvious question. What does bankable actually mean? Let me translate. A PPP contract is bankable when a bank can look at it and say: “Fine. If everything goes wrong… we still get our money back.” That’s it. Not innovation. Not sustainability. Not beautiful PowerPoints. Money back. In Question 50 of the course below, I explain what really makes a PPP contract bankable. Because...