Lawyers paradise - 7 years late, 3x the cost... and a city full of lawsuits


Edinburgh, Scotland.
Mid-2000s.
A shiny new tram network was promised.
Fast, green, world-class transport across the city.

Greta was not born yet… but she could be smiling for ours to a project like this.

​

The vehicle?
Of course…

A complex PPP scheme led by Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE) with multiple contractors, including Bilfinger Berger and Siemens.

​
Signed in 2006.
Cost? ÂŁ375 million.
Opening date? 2011.

​

What actually happened?

  • Endless disputes between the public agency and the private contractors.
  • Construction delays so bad that people literally forgot the city was supposed to have trams.
  • Streets ripped up for years, paralyzing local businesses.
  • Costs ballooned to ÂŁ1 billion — almost 3x the original.

​

Lawyers paradise… Who sued who?

  • Contractors sued the public agency for design changes and late payments.
  • The public agency threatened to sue the contractors for cost overruns and missed deadlines.
  • Residents and businesses started separate lawsuits over lost income and disturbance.

​

2014 — The first line finally opens.
Seven years late.
One single line instead of the full network.

The political fallout?

  • Heads rolled.
  • Public trust in PPPs collapsed.
  • Edinburgh became a punchline for bad project management across Europe.
  • Great was born… unhappy.

​

Brutal lessons:

  • If the project scope isn’t 100% locked before signing, you're building a time bomb.
  • Multi-contractor PPPs need wartime-grade governance, not PowerPoint slides.
  • Political wishful thinking kills delivery discipline.
  • Litigation isn't a risk; it’s a certainty when your contract is a mess.

​

Moral:
If your project needs seven years of excuses, lawsuits, and triple the money,
you didn’t build infrastructure.
You built a monument to failure.

​

I have other interesting and horror stories about my last project in the link below.

​

$99.90

The 15 Top Lessons of a PPP Project Nightmare

Learn about:
The number 1 killer of Projects
Why this was not going to be just "another construction project, mate"... Read more

​

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

​

​

Vicente Valencia

I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

Time for a ridiculous story from the world of infrastructure contracts. You know, those multi-billion-dollar deals where one tiny typo can turn into a legendary office joke. Well… here you are one. Picture this. Somewhere in Europe. A massive bridge project. The contract is huge, hundreds of pages of legal and technical jargon. In the middle of all that, there was supposed to be a clause that said the contractor had to provide a "large-tonnage crane." Don’t ask why. Maybe some stupid Spanish...

I receive their email religiously every week. They fabricate and install curtains. You don’t expect to be renewing those things every week. Nor every year. But here they are, sending those emails weekly. On the other hand, I tried to look for 15 min for the guys that do the shampooing of my carpet. That’s something that you should be doing twice or so a year. Not an email. And still… is there anything more recurrent / certain? Probably yes, but it’s Sunday and I have the brain focused on...

A couple of weeks ago, I received a call from an agent. Vicente, I have this house for you, and you should take a look. I receive the link. I take a look. The ratio rooms: people was 2:1 and I counted the cat as one. “Too big for us”. “Too big? But you can afford it” “That may be true, but it’s too big, we don’t need that space”. The conversation could have ended there, but insistence is too much of a temptation… especially, when you don’t have many prospects. If you thought that the decision...