Lawyers paradise - 7 years late, 3x the cost... and a city full of lawsuits


Edinburgh, Scotland.
Mid-2000s.
A shiny new tram network was promised.
Fast, green, world-class transport across the city.

Greta was not born yet… but she could be smiling for ours to a project like this.

The vehicle?
Of course…

A complex PPP scheme led by Transport Initiatives Edinburgh (TIE) with multiple contractors, including Bilfinger Berger and Siemens.

​
Signed in 2006.
Cost? ÂŁ375 million.
Opening date? 2011.

What actually happened?

  • Endless disputes between the public agency and the private contractors.
  • Construction delays so bad that people literally forgot the city was supposed to have trams.
  • Streets ripped up for years, paralyzing local businesses.
  • Costs ballooned to ÂŁ1 billion — almost 3x the original.

Lawyers paradise… Who sued who?

  • Contractors sued the public agency for design changes and late payments.
  • The public agency threatened to sue the contractors for cost overruns and missed deadlines.
  • Residents and businesses started separate lawsuits over lost income and disturbance.

2014 — The first line finally opens.
Seven years late.
One single line instead of the full network.

The political fallout?

  • Heads rolled.
  • Public trust in PPPs collapsed.
  • Edinburgh became a punchline for bad project management across Europe.
  • Great was born… unhappy.

Brutal lessons:

  • If the project scope isn’t 100% locked before signing, you're building a time bomb.
  • Multi-contractor PPPs need wartime-grade governance, not PowerPoint slides.
  • Political wishful thinking kills delivery discipline.
  • Litigation isn't a risk; it’s a certainty when your contract is a mess.

Moral:
If your project needs seven years of excuses, lawsuits, and triple the money,
you didn’t build infrastructure.
You built a monument to failure.

I have other interesting and horror stories about my last project in the link below.

$99.90

The 15 Top Lessons of a PPP Project Nightmare

Learn about:
The number 1 killer of Projects
Why this was not going to be just "another construction project, mate"... Read more

​

PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day.

PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com

PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below.

Vicente Valencia

I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇

Read more from Vicente Valencia

That’s how many countries approach infrastructure. Big pipeline. Big announcements. Zero learning. Norway did the opposite. Smart those guys. In the early 2000s, they tested PPPs with just three projects: E39 Klett–Bårdshaug (opened 2005) E39 Lyngdal–Flekkefjord (opened 2006) E18 Grimstad–Kristiansand (opened 2009) That’s it. Three shots. Not fifteen. Not a political fireworks show. A controlled experiment. Same model. Same timeframe. Comparable results. And guess what? They delivered. On...

A few days ago, I had a big argument with my team in Panama. They had spent almost 3 weeks trying to convince a client to change banks for her mortgage. It was a no-brainer.Lower interest rates.Lower fees. They showed her, over and over again, different scenarios… all in vain. You may wonder how, after 2 or 3 days of trying, they kept pushing. She is a public servant.And the team was trying to convince her to move from a government-owned bank to a fully private one. I repeat.Public servant....

The French writer and poet Antoine de Saint-Exupéry once said: “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add… but when there is nothing left to take away.” And yet… People still have 10-line disclaimers in their email signatures. Or worse… the “please don’t print this email” line. I’ve reviewed bids where they were one step away from including the name and breed of the bid manager’s dog. Horror vacui. Or just… “just in case”. Every extra word that doesn’t serve a purpose?...