|
Let me tell you a bedtime story. It’s about a classic PPP project. ​ However, it’s a bedtime story for the nightmares. ​ It starts in Australia. Sunshine. Kangaroos. And a bunch of brilliant bureaucrats who thought they could outsmart the laws of project finance. ​ The name? Airport Link Tunnel in Brisbane. ​ You see, they had a vision. A tunnel linking Brisbane Airport with the city. As I said… A classic PPP. ​ Except it wasn't. ​ They forecasted 135,000 vehicles per day. ​ ​ They gave a 45-year concession. ​ ​ They put most of the risk on the private sector. Well… ​ The theory of risk transfer works perfectly… until the private sector runs straight into bankruptcy court. ​ By 2013, BrisConnections, the private consortium behind it, was dead. And the cherry on top? La guinda, as we say in Spanish? ​ Meanwhile, the government shrugged: ​ ​ Yes… Yes… Exactly. ​ We keep saying PPPs are about risk transfer. ​ This wasn’t a tunnel. ​ Moral of the story? ​ Sweet dreams, my friends. ​ By the way… Want more brutal truths about PPPs, minus the buzzwords?
​
​ PD 1: If you liked this email, don't keep it in secret and forward it to a friend. They will thank you enormously one day. PD 2: If somebody has sent you this email and you want to receive emails like this yourself, visit vicentevalencia.com PD 3: If you want unsubscribe, click the link below. ​ ​ |
I talk about Personal Growth, Management, Infrastructure and More | 👇JOIN +2k readers 👇
I’m doing quite a lot of work these days with market lead proposals. I mean, proposals coming directly from the market and made to the government of New Zealand. I love the ideas put forward by proponent. Their enthusiasm. And commitment. Most of them fail in the “exclusivity” criteria. Why you are so good that the government absolutely needs to negotiate with you directly without going to the market. It’s fascinating. That’s a high bar, but some people get through it. IP, exclusive rights to...
Time for a ridiculous story from the world of infrastructure contracts. You know, those multi-billion-dollar deals where one tiny typo can turn into a legendary office joke. Well… here you are one. Picture this. Somewhere in Europe. A massive bridge project. The contract is huge, hundreds of pages of legal and technical jargon. In the middle of all that, there was supposed to be a clause that said the contractor had to provide a "large-tonnage crane." Don’t ask why. Maybe some stupid Spanish...
I receive their email religiously every week. They fabricate and install curtains. You don’t expect to be renewing those things every week. Nor every year. But here they are, sending those emails weekly. On the other hand, I tried to look for 15 min for the guys that do the shampooing of my carpet. That’s something that you should be doing twice or so a year. Not an email. And still… is there anything more recurrent / certain? Probably yes, but it’s Sunday and I have the brain focused on...